Results are discussed in terms of study limitations and possible conceptual and operational applications. Finally, players considered leaders influence the game more than non-leaders and players identified as both leader and cyberbully generate no effect on game influence compared to players not identified as both cyberbully and leader.

Furthermore, the amount of cyberbullying in groups generated no effect on target participation. Additionally, cyberbullying behavior and prosocial behavior increased a sense of belonging compared to groups where cyberbullying occurred earlier in the game. Groups using only prosocial messages were more successful than groups with cyberbullying messages and had a significantly better survival score when prosocial messages occurred late in the game. Overall, cyberbullying behavior had little effect on game outcome, group cohesion and target participation. Out of the 41 groups 25 groups had cyberbullying behavior present and 16 groups had prosocial behavior. failure), group cohesion, target participation, and perceptions of bullies.

Four hypotheses were advanced assessing cyberbullying behavior and game outcome (success vs.

A sample of 41 4-person groups generated a total n = 415 messages used for evaluating the behavioral content of game play. This study sought to further our understanding of the role of cyberbullying in the cooperative team-based game Left 4 Dead 2 (L4D2).